Sorry, but requiring requests to public activitypub objects to be signed is completely whack, merveilles.town
Sorry, but requiring requests to public activitypub objects to be signed is completely whack, merveilles.town
@gancio Note that in the context
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
"https://w3id.org/fep/8a8e",
"https://schema.org",
it is important what comes first. The latter is used in case an attribute exists in multiple ones. I guess you should switch the order :)
You know, it’s entirely possible to use ATProto without touching anything owned by Bluesky proper
Pretending that Bluesky is the whole of ATProto is like pretending the whole of the Fediverse is Mastodon
Stop using your ignorance as vindication in your choice of home platform, it’s not ATProto vs ActivityPub
It’s the Social Web vs centralized social media
I too consider coding, generally, a means to an end.
However, in software development, isn't often the real problem to find out *what precisely* is the end?
Bugs can result from perfectly coded software if you haven't fully considered that what you really, *really* want is zig a zig ah.
I mean, I just did every search query as an actor.. and this isn’t much different.
Every *potential* number is ready to go, and just gets a db entry (and actual behavior) once someone interacts with it.
Fascinating idea! And stuff like this is going to spark many more..
Would you Follow the book in order to see when it’s back on the shelf?
@benpate @julian@activitypub.space @smallcircles In case you haven't come across it yet, https://millsfield.sfomuseum.org/blog/2024/03/12/activitypub/ will be a fun read!
> who says fediverse accounts need to be people?
Certainly not me. I'm thinking on an actor-based service-oriented fedi, which more closely represents actor model. Where the social network is a pure social graph of addressible actors, that can be introspected for the services they provide.
Yes, a book might be an actor, as well as the shelf :)
@smallcircles @hongminhee @evan @steve browser.pub is incorrect here -- having a range of Object or Link doesn't mean that schema PropertyValue is not allowed. it means that the value is inferred to be an Object or a Link *in addition to* a PropertyValue. there is no problem as long as there are no conflicting statements being made.
cc @js
Oh, cool! So, yes, I'd highly recommend the book I wrote for O'Reilly Media about ActivityPub: