In reply to: https://lemmy.ca/post/62271746
What does he mean by required? This law would apply to a tiny fraction of users - no one in my continent for example. I hope he understands there’s no way it should be required for everyone.
What does he mean by required? This law would apply to a tiny fraction of users - no one in my continent for example. I hope he understands there’s no way it should be required for everyone.
This law affects exactly 0 users on my entire content… So why do I need this nonsense? Even systemd change is bullshit and doesn’t affect me.
there’s so much shit to implement in linux, new shit to make, old shit to fix. preemptively adding this bullshit should be shot down in flames and this joker excluded from any and all FOSS avenues on account of spam and trolling.
I am sure the tali-fucking-ban are tali-fucking-banning women from using the computers by way of whatever passes for laws over there. is this bootlicker gonna implement “just a JSON field” to that end as well?
grow a spine, you corpo-fetishizing cowards. where’s the “fuck you, make me” attitude? what, california of all places is gonna ban linux? fucking lol.
evidently the systemd and arch requests were from the same guy.
Discussion?
Yeah. That’s not what’s happening.
Censoring dissent, is what I hear is happening.
without anyone even threatening any meaningful action,
The law goes into effect Jan 1, 2027. It’s pretty clear about that bit.
The ending content is pretty level-headed about this. Basically, “wait for a legal consult/directives from Arch Linux before implementing anything.” That seems like the most prudent thing to do.
You guys hear a lot