Home

Anti-libraryism: 10 web APIs that replace modern JavaScript libraries

$$2106
https://programming.dev/u/codeinabox posted on Feb 21, 2026 11:19
https://programming.dev/post/46111620
Reply
$$2107
https://lemmy.world/u/Solumbran posted on Feb 21, 2026 12:30
In reply to: https://programming.dev/post/46111620

I mean, it’s good, but what needs to be replaced is javascript.

https://lemmy.world/comment/22266347
Reply
$$2108
https://programming.dev/u/codeinabox posted on Feb 21, 2026 12:38
In reply to: https://lemmy.world/comment/22266347

I’m intrigued, what would you replace it with?

https://programming.dev/comment/22314217
Reply
$$2109
https://lemmy.world/u/Solumbran posted on Feb 21, 2026 12:49
In reply to: https://programming.dev/comment/22314217

Anything else, basically. There’s not a lot of languages that are currently used and much worse.

My preference would lean towards something like Nim, probably, but I’m definitely not the best one to answer that. But javascript and its whole ecosystem is rotten (I mean, that’s sort of the reason the article exists here) and it is just not fit to make anything. The fact that people even bring javascript as the backend is a bit crazy to me.

https://lemmy.world/comment/22266550
Reply
$$2110
https://programming.dev/u/codeinabox posted on Feb 21, 2026 12:53
In reply to: https://lemmy.world/comment/22266550

The fact that people even bring javascript as the backend is a bit crazy to me.

To clarify do you mean replacing JavaScript just on the backend? This article is about using JavaScript on the front end.

https://programming.dev/comment/22314396
Reply
$$2111
https://lemmy.world/u/Solumbran posted on Feb 21, 2026 13:27
In reply to: https://programming.dev/comment/22314396

I mean both. But while I understand that there is for now not a lot of alternatives for web scripting, there is a lot of backend languages which makes backend javascript even worse.

https://lemmy.world/comment/22266976
Reply
$$2118
https://programming.dev/u/sukhmel posted on Feb 21, 2026 19:18
In reply to: https://programming.dev/post/46111620

Are those APIs supported by all major browsers or is it Chrome(-ium) only? Even if those are supported, it will mean the users may need to update their browser to use the site (but maybe the support is implemented long ago and that’s not much of an issue)

https://programming.dev/comment/22319784
Reply
$$2306
https://programming.dev/u/codeinabox posted on Feb 21, 2026 20:53
In reply to: https://programming.dev/comment/22319784

Check against Can I Use, all of the APIs, except for the following are supported by major browsers: - Synchronous Clipboard API only Safari has full support, the rest have partial - Temporal only currently supported in Chrome and Firefox

https://programming.dev/comment/22321145
Reply
$$2312
https://piefed.social/u/nykula posted on Feb 21, 2026 21:04
In reply to: https://programming.dev/comment/22319784

Was a bit embarrassed when showing a prototype using Temporal last month and the provided computer’s Chrome turned out not recent enough to support it, so for this one API I’ll wait for one more year before considering it ready.

https://piefed.social/comment/10236938
Reply