Technically, it’s an astrospam measure.
No they use something else for that, ie limit what new accounts can do.
The credit score is just doing things the dev doesn’t like/shouldn’t be done
https://join.piefed.social/2024/06/22/piefed-features-for-growing-healthy-communities/
There’s nothing in that post about ❝credit scores.❞ Karma is what threadiverse uses to evaluate posts, comments, communties, and accounts.
There is attitude and reputation
There is attitude and reputation
Yeah, did you not read why? How else do you want to piefed to mitigate onetime spam accounts to sibyl downvote comments?
Do you read because that’s unrelated to their spam protections.
The scores are for activities the dev doesn’t like not for spam blocking.
Again: how would you mitigate against mass onetime accounts meant to downvote specific comments fascists have been using to silence others?
Because piefed believes monitoring the “attitude” of an account and “repudiating” are the temporary measures for this behavior. Lemmy just let’s occur, wilfully aware it persists.
By not making a system that helps continue that exact behavior with a system that pushes people for being downvoted that exact way or don’t interact with posts how the dev wants.
The ‘Rep’ column is their reputation. As you can see, some people have been downvoted thousands of times. They’re not going to change their ways, are they?
The functionality is exact opposite of what you want. It’s empowering mass downvoting to silence others because that’s how the system is designed.
Because piefed believes monitoring the “attitude” of an account and “repudiating” it are the temporary measures for this behavior.
Again it’s not that’s the guiding principle listed for how they want to have spaces and users behave.
So links to same page saying it’s features made to do social media credit scores and then piefed issues?
What are you trying to say with that?
Can I buy a house with these?
So are just randomly replying
I’m trying to see if I can try a different framing for your backfire effect for you to criticallly read this without your biases.
Can you rebase your thinking?
Bias on how piefed is set up by their own sign up page?
I’m only replying at this point for others as you don’t seem to read
Who are these “others”?
Anyone who can make it this deep in the thread. Or do you think this is a private conversation on a public forum?
Why would anyone want read your denial about astrospam mitigations you refuse to provide alternatives for?
Piefed is a tool anyone can use. If you feel mass downvoting with an account is something like social “credit” that piefeed nomenclatures as “attitude,” then I have no idea how users will use that credit, and what for. “Repudiation” is something all threadiverse software mitigates one way or another.
And I am being extremely generous, as it seems you don’t know anything about computer sciences.