Goofed Home

California's age verification law is proving controversial — here's what you need to know, and why some Linux distros are in the firing line

$$6569
https://piefed.ca/u/Sunshine posted on Mar 3, 2026 09:28
https://piefed.ca/c/technology/p/566626/california-s-age-verification-law-is-proving-controversial-here-s-what-you-need-to-know-and

$$6862
https://discuss.tchncs.de/u/apparia posted on Mar 3, 2026 23:47
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25625174

Thanks, honestly I had not actually read the bill before coming here to shitpost, and it seems like yeah it’s more well-intentioned than people are giving it credit for.

I still have serious reservations about the broadness, vagueness, and premise that mandatory age signals are a good idea at all – it’s a lateral move at best; weakly attempting to curb the most overtly predatory parts of the whole “age verification” movement, without opposing the idea itself.

But you’re right, it’s not the blatant data-vacuuming law that I think some people imagine it to be.

https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/24293704
$$6969
https://fedia.io/u/Th4tGuyII posted on Mar 4, 2026 08:47
In reply to: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/24734794

IMO the real solution to preventing kids getting into adult content is for Governments to agree on and enforce a universal set of parental controls that every program and website has to respect. Put the onus on parents to make sure their kids aren’t doing that stuff.

But that’s not the world we’re working with. Instead Governments have decided they’re going to play nanny, and it would appear nobody is taking no for an answer.

So from a practical perspective, if I’m going to have to play along, I’d much rather my own computer handle my sensitive data locally and prove my age for me, than multiple fuckwits’ servers off who-knows-where holding onto that data per website I want to visit.

https://fedia.io/m/technology@piefed.social/t/3534796/-/comment/14264150

Conversation

$$821
https://lemmy.ml/u/LeninWeave posted on Feb 19, 2026 15:25
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25353619

accuses me of dodging criticism for making a very specific argument about how treating real and fake genocide as equivalent is a form of genocide denial

Somehow, you don’t see the irony.

https://lemmy.ml/comment/24058641

4 posts in conversation

$$1141
https://lemmy.ml/u/agentant posted on Feb 19, 2026 22:20
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25353619

I don’t see how highlighting Khurbn denial is dodging criticism.

https://lemmy.ml/comment/24066666
$$1330
https://lemmy.ml/u/BrainInABox posted on Feb 20, 2026 04:58
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25361063

They directly addressed it, ya lying freak

https://lemmy.ml/comment/24072375

Conversation

$$884
https://slrpnk.net/u/LibertyLizard posted on Feb 19, 2026 16:29
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25353693

Maybe… this is where I guess the instance rules get in the way because I’d like to know what exactly that looks like. Because it’s well known that communists and others tried to violently resist the Nazis in the lead up to the third reich. So you’d have to articulate how your strategy was different from what was tried and failed.

My reading of history is that sporadic violence is a very ineffective anti-fascist tactic.

https://slrpnk.net/comment/20822325

Conversation

$$826
https://lemmy.ml/u/LeninWeave posted on Feb 19, 2026 15:29
In reply to: https://mander.xyz/comment/25353560

Unlike yourself and that other user, who are simply neutral observers? lmao

https://lemmy.ml/comment/24058694

Create New Post