Goofed Home

I want at least a third of the cases to have a mundane explanation.

It got silly when they discovered the supernatural week after week.

My way, you’d actually have some suspense.

Reboot? Not a continuation? The last episode ended on a cliffhanger

Did the government of China renounce its claim to West Taiwan?

I hate those APEs!!

You need emergency KFR pills!

Im right now using lemmy/piefed but what other neat projects should i look into as a newcomer to this world?

Im not looking for anything in particular, i just want to expand what i use and see more projects.

BookWyrm, reading tracker and review sharing

I don’t know if it’s wrong and how much, but I’ve seen it likened to Imgur more than YouTube: a place from which you link your videos in other parts of the recovered, rather than a platform to browse videos fed by the algorithm. Sorry if I’m mistaken.

I’d like to ask the good people of this community that, if you do know the solution or figure it out, that you not share the answer here. Feel free to announce your success, but there’s something to be said for discovering the answer completely unaided, even if it takes years.

It’s embarrassingly obvious once you see it though.

Figured it out. Not sure what everyone means by a second obvious solution that doesn’t work on the last one. My first solution that works on more than one works on all of them.

Ah, dang sorry for ruining it for you.

This is my favorite web dev blog, his grid and flex tutorials are amazing with all those interactive examples.

Came here to say the same thing but for SVG

Demon? Damon? Or something more exotic?

You people use meat flapping to communicate?

I always thought the 2 pronunciation of route were different but similar things. Raut as in a set road between two large places, not specific place in a city but the city itself. Root as a path between 2 specific points, house to house.

I come with a seemingly simple question: should outbound links be styled differently than intra-site links? For example, the way Wikipedia does it with an icon after the text of the link. Do users care? Did anyone done any research on that?

I’m thinking of situations where you might have a sentence like ‘I’ve written about this before, and recent events around ACME corporation only made me entrenched in my opinion.’ where ‘written about this before’ would be a link to another page on the website and ‘recent events around ACME corporation’ would be link to external site.

That’s also my thinking, but it does add some visual clutter plus wouldn’t the counterargument be that people who really care can use their own user styles or extensions, or look at the status bar?

No I don’t accept the counter argument as an argument. People who care shouldn’t jump through hoops to get what they deserve.

And the visual clutter is way too little to care.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/946712

Comments

Targeting sub 1s build times seems like the wrong optimisation. If you write your content in markdown you can just preview it in a browser with ~1ms latency, because you don’t need no fancy build system to do that. When you’ve written your post, put it in the site data structure, hit build, and go make a coffee.

If your objective is to put content on the internet, this will be more than enough. If it is instead to create The Most Perfectest Website Framework Ever, then unfortunately Spring Boot already exists 😏

Go for the fun, but your issue is a non issue. I use Zola (built with Rust) and it is very very fast. A full build of ~200 pages takes ~2s and in dev mode, changes are reflected almost instantly.

thank you for sharing my product here! I grew up on forums, it’s somewhat of a love letter to the mid 2000s I spent many hours of my youth with, happy to answer any questions on the project!

sure, so I use a ton of codegen and hand-write the openapi schema, jsonschemas and database model, I use my butt often to write the mapping/binding boilerplate that goes between the outside-to-inside world (database stuff to queriers/writers and http handlers to actual logic) then I write the logic itself as well as the end-to-end tests. I find language models work very well once you have a clear set of constraints/boundaries such as a clear api contract + generated types or a set of tests that define the behaviour. I use a mix of claude and codex. Claude I find works well for exploratory/experimental work (a ton of the new plugin system was R&D so claude helped set up and tear down a bunch of potential implementations and ideas) codex is a lot less interactive and doesn’t seem to play well with creative r&d style exploratory workflows, so I use that one more for well planned out features using the codegen mentioned before.

while I somewhat understand the “sticking point” it allows me to work faster and focus on the more enjoyable side of the craft i’ve honed for almost 20 years. While it’s still not a super popular project and a couple of friends sometimes help, it’s just me doing it so the my butt helps a lot when I only have a couple of hours a night to work on it!

outside of pure code, I used a combination of very early generative imagery models (circa 2022 I think) for the hero art, which started life as a sketch, scanned in, with some iterations on Dall-E (back when it was an app before chatgpt absorbed it) and a few hours painting and expanding in photoshop with my wacom. for future art on blog posts and such, I’m keen to commission a human artist for future marketing assets (in case you know anyone!)

and I think finally, lots of exploratory discussion with chatgpt on api design, http semantics, cross-browser cookie behaviours, boring stuff like that… very useful!

do you think it would be worth including some blurb about how ai tools are used in the readme for this kinda crowd who are understandably skeptical of many open source projects now due to irresponsible usage of ai?

I think a blurb would be a great idea, especially for your project.

I feel like the biggest hurdle for your project is that the people it speaks to, especially the way you market it (analogues to natural, organic things like plants, the purposeful methodology intrinsic to gardening, as well as the nostalgic throwback to a simpler time of the internet when everything was more hand-made and deliberate) are the same people that will be put off by AI, being that it’s the antithesis of those things.

Making your case for why and how it’s used, (IE Not just vibe-coded slop but something that matters a little more to you) might be enough to keep people on board.